Co-authored a package of 2025 gun-control bills: a handgun waiting period (AB 324/SB 330), a ban on “undetectable firearms”/unserialized frames or receivers — i.e., a ghost-gun ban (AB 321/SB 332), expanded background checks on firearm sales and transfers (AB 325), and an Extreme Risk Protection Order (“red flag”) bill (AB 319/SB 329). Source: Wisconsin State Legislature, Rep. Robyn Vining bill sponsorship list — https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/13/vining/ (also mirrored at https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/legislators/assembly/2846)
In a 2019 op-ed, Vining personally called for “ERPOs (Extreme Risk Protection Orders), universal background checks, and reinstating the 48-hour waiting period for firearm purchases,” writing this is needed to fight “the gun violence epidemic.”
Source: Patch, “Rep. Robyn Vining: We Must Protect Against Gun Violence” — https://patch.com/wisconsin/wauwatosa/rep-robyn-vining-we-must-protect-against-gun-violence
Vining’s own campaign site lists endorsements from EMILY’s List, Moms Demand Action Gun Sense Candidate, and States Win (formerly known as Sister District) for her 2026 State Senate run, alongside U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin and a long list of labor unions.
Source: Robyn For WI, Endorsements page — https://www.robynforwi.com/endorsements/ (screenshot the “States Win,” “Emily’s List,” and “Moms Demand Action Gun Sense Candidate” logo tiles)
Previous-cycle endorsers listed on the same page include Everytown for Gun Safety, Planned Parenthood Wisconsin, Human Rights Campaign, Sierra Club, and the National Democratic Redistricting Committee.
Source: Same as above — https://www.robynforwi.com/endorsements/
Assembly Bill 308 would have barred state, county, municipal, and pass-through federal dollars from paying for health care for people not lawfully present in the U.S. It was introduced and cosponsored entirely by Republicans (27-0 partisan sponsorship) and passed the Assembly 51–44 on a party-line vote on September 11, 2025. No Democrats signed on as cosponsors, and Jacobson — a Democrat representing AD-50 — was on record opposing the bill.
Source (roll call): Wisconsin State Legislature, 2025 Assembly Vote 91 — https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2025/related/votes/assembly/av0091 (shows the 51–44 party-line tally; screenshot the named roll call for Jacobson’s “No” vote)
Source (bill summary/context): LegiScan, WI AB308 — https://legiscan.com/WI/bill/AB308/2025
Source (reporting): Wisconsin Examiner, “Republican bill bars state, local funding of health services for immigrants without legal status” — https://wisconsinexaminer.com/2025/09/09/republican-bill-bars-state-local-funding-of-health-services-for-immigrants-without-legal-status/ (confirms “No Democrats are signed onto the bill”)
From at least 2021, Jung served as RYDE Racine’s (the city’s public transit system) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Liaison Officer — the official directly responsible for the agency’s compliance with 49 CFR Part 26, the federal DOT regulation requiring transit agencies to set contracting goals for businesses owned by people the federal government deems “socially and economically disadvantaged.”
Source: City of Racine/RYDE, “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Three-Year Goal-Setting Methodology Report,” FFY 2022-2024, listing “RYDE’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Liaison Officer, Trevor Jung” with his direct phone and city email — https://www.ryderacine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Racine-Disadvantaged-Business-Enterprise-Goals-2022-2024_compressed.pdf
That document shows the program explicitly splits contracting goals into a “race-neutral” and “race-conscious” component — RYDE set a combined 2.9% DBE goal (about $208,000) for FY2022–2024, with $139,000 of that total earmarked specifically under the “race-conscious” goal split. Source: Same PDF — https://www.ryderacine.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Racine-Disadvantaged-Business-Enterprise-Goals-2022-2024_compressed.pdf
Why it’s worth expanding on: This isn’t a passive title — under federal regulation (49 CFR §26.25), the DBE Liaison Officer has “direct, independent access” to the agency’s CEO and is personally responsible for developing, implementing, and monitoring the entire DBE compliance program, including setting overall contracting goals split by race and sex. This puts Jung’s name on the agency’s own race-conscious goal-setting framework as a matter of official record, not a one-off statement — a useful angle alongside the broader “DEI bureaucrat” framing being used against other Democratic candidates in this set. Voters can be shown his name and direct contact info appearing on a formal disadvantaged-business compliance document. Source for the role generally: U.S. DOT definition of the DBE Liaison Officer function — https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-A/part-26/subpart-B/section-26.25

(Dr. Denise Wooten, “GUN SAFETY: SENSIBLE SOLUTIONS,” Blog Post, 6/5/22)





Summary: Turner represented defendant Jorge Maldonado-Barragan, an immigrant unlawfully present in the U.S., who was arrested for intent to distribute/ possession of methamphetamine. In an additional proceeding, Turner requested “the low end of the range” after Maldonado-Barragan took a plea deal.
Violation: 21 U.S.C. §846
Sentence: 21 Months imprisonment + Credit for prior imprisonment + 3 years of supervised release + $100 penalty.
Editor’s Note: Further court documents confirm Maldonado-Barragan was sent to deportation proceedings after release from confinement.Editor’s Note: Research has verified that the defendant’s counsel and the candidate in question are the same person.


Sentencing Document: Case 6:12-cr-00066-JDK-KNM/Document 107 329 /Filed 06/17/13/ Page 1

In a Facebook post, she claims voting for Trump “cost lives.”
“MAGA mentality” has always been there, and they continue to carry out racism in other ways. https://www.instagram.com/p/DHySYg6N1e_
Clear Anti-ICE Sentiment: https://www.instagram.com/p/DFVhBH3Og6u
She reposted a video on TikTok claiming that Socialism and Communism are good: https://www.tiktok.com/@darth_nater59/video/7447688845308464415
She reposted a video that supports the “atheist community”: https://www.tiktok.com/@evansaysblah/video/7436869554858478894

Source: https://x.com/proudsocialist/status/2011926076717445301?s=46&t=98i9WyDs95ANHmoC61jm0g

Source: https://x.com/maddenifico/status/2006741416953946511?s=46&t=98i9WyDs95ANHmoC61jm0g
“Killing” Transgender Restrictions: In an official June 2021 [1] legislative newsletter, Morales explicitly celebrated Pride Month and took personal credit for “killing” and “successfully [using] the deadlines” to defeat bills that would have restricted youth gender-transition procedures and regulated sports participation based on biological sex
Targeting Transgender Legislation: He characterized SB 29 (a bill to protect girls’ sports) as a “discriminatory bill meant to target transgender kids” and celebrated the preservation of gender-reassignment surgeries for minors by helping defeat HB 1399.
Support for “Red Flag” Laws: In a 2024 candidate survey[1], Morales called for “common sense gun-safety laws” including raising the age to 21 to purchase semi-automatic rifles, universal background checks, and red flag laws.
Voucher Repeal: He has taken a hardline stance against school choice, vowing to [1] “oppose vouchers at every turn” and explicitly supporting the “full repeal” of state education savings account programs.
Fiscal “F” Rating: Morales has a career cumulative grade of “F” from Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, receiving failing marks in 2021, 2023, and 2025 [1] for consistently favoring government expansion over tax relief.
Abortion Law Loopholes (HB 44[1] ): Authored the “Life of the Mother Act,” which critics argue expands the definition of “medical emergency” to create broad legal exceptions to state abortion bans and protects physicians performing abortions from disciplinary action.
Targeting Executive Security (HB 1034): Authored a bill requiring state officials to reimburse the state for out-of-state travel and security costs. This is viewed by opposition researchers as a direct political attack on Governor Abbott’s border security operations.
Blocking DEI Bans (SB 17[1] ): Voted against the ban on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) offices and hiring practices in Texas public universities.
Key Floor Votes
Against Pediatric Gender Care Ban (SB 14, 2023[1] ): Plesa voted against the bill that prohibited medical providers from performing gender-affirming surgeries or administering cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers to minors.
Against Women’s Sports Restrictions (SB 15, 2023[1] ): She voted against preserving female athletic opportunities by restricting participation in collegiate sports based on biological sex.
Against Drag Show Restrictions (SB 12, 2023[1] ): She voted against establishing restrictions on sexually oriented performances, such as drag shows, in public spaces where children are present.
Against School Library Standards (HB 900, 2023[1] ): Plesa voted against the Reader Act, which established standards to prevent sexually explicit books from being distributed in public school libraries.
Against Spending Controls (HB 100, Amendment 1[1] ): She voted against a taxpayer-protection amendment that would have required school districts to spend at least 50% of their funds on teacher salaries rather than administrative waste.
Against the DEI Ban (SB 17, 2023[1] ): Plesa voted against the bill that eliminated diversity offices, mandatory diversity training, and identity-conscious hiring standards in public universities.
Political Theatre
In August 2025, Texas state Representative Mihaela Plesa (along with dozens of other Texas House Democrats) participated in a two-week walkout to break legislative quorum and block a Republican-led redistricting map aimed at giving the GOP five additional U.S. House seats. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Quorum Break: Democrats fled the state, temporarily denying Republicans the attendance required to vote on the redrawn congressional maps. [1]
National Impact: Plesa stated the walkout ignited a nationwide movement. The redistricting battle also prompted retaliatory action from Democrats in other states, such as California, who introduced their own new congressional boundaries in response. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Repercussions: The absent Democrats faced daily fines and ultimately the maps passed, though Plesa and her colleagues pivoted to a continued legal battle over the gerrymandered maps. [1, 2]
